Cross-corpus responsibility map

A shared word is not an implementation contract. This map classifies relationships rather than drawing an implied deployed universal stack. This map accompanies edition 2026.10.8 and retains the relationships described in 2026.10.7. Each endpoint retains its own source edition and assurance limits.

Relationship	Classification	Responsibility and unresolved boundary
Institutional doctrine → MIRAGE	Explicit authored contract	The contract proposes scoped refinement of institutional constraints to an enforcement reference. It does not certify all doctrine claims or a hostile-host deployment.
Freehold ↔ Cuttlefish	Implemented relationship, per retained dated report	Persistent institution-originated work connects to host authority and execution. Evidence separates source inspection from workload observation and customer fulfillment.
AD8 ↔ institutional thesis	Conceptual alignment	Both separate identity, authority, evidence and continuity; no vault-wide supersession or production control-plane identity is inferred.
AD8 ↔ CSSL	Unresolved dependency	Canonical identity and causally justified change need consistent construction and preservation rules. Construction states a logical limit, not a native composition.
CSSL ↔ IC/POAR	Proposed integration	Premise-aware changes could feed realization and validation. A complete implementation/refinement relation remains missing.
IC/POAR ↔ Semantic OS	Conceptual alignment	Explicit meaning and obligations inform projections; full application equivalence and authorized repair need evidence.
Cuttlebone ↔ Freehold	Authored contract	Founding scope and origin constrain effect ceilings in the specification. A separate operating profile and component-level conformance are required.
MIRAGE ↔ AD8	Proposed integration	Final effect enforcement could consume qualified authority. No public teaching model implements that native interface.
SEPION ↔ AD8	Conceptual alignment	Generated-artifact evaluation must retain scope, distinguishing evidence and nonclaims. No transferable certificate equivalence is established.
RCFS ↔ institutional thesis	Conceptual alignment	Amendments and resources remain constrained by declared laws; unresolved constructors and real custody cannot be skipped.
CHROMATIC ↔ operating environment	Proposed integration	User-visible actions and recourse must reflect actual effect state and authority. Irreversible effects limit universal undo claims.
Experience Economy ↔ The Reckoning	Unresolved dependency	Reuse and reputation depend on evaluation and governance scope; precedence and learned-influence revocation remain unresolved.
Human–LLM elicitation ↔ Engineering Methodology	Conceptual alignment	Substantive AI collaboration motivates empirical study. Methodology attribution is not a measured elicitation result.
Architecture synthesis ↔ all sixteen areas	Conceptual alignment	The synthesis is a responsibility map and research program, not proof of an integrated deployed machine.

Research Depth & Proof provides technical synopses and falsifiable paths for every maintained area. The public evidence catalog deliberately contains no private source graph, operational topology or generated native interface.